IP Topics

Turning Effect due to Non-Perpendicular Forces

When applying the principle of moments to calculate the magnitude of a force creating a turning effect, where the force is not perpendicular to the length of the object, there are two approaches.

Take the following problem:

A uniform rectangular beam has negligible thickness and weight 850 N. Its length is 5.0 m and it is in contact with the top of a support at point P. P is 0.80 m from one end of the beam.

The beam is held stationary, at an angle of 30° to the horizontal, by a rope that is attached to the bottom corner of the other end of the beam.

Calculate the magnitude of the force T on the beam due to the tension in the rope.

Approach 1: Identifying the perpendicular distance between line of action of the force and pivot

In the applet above, check the box that says “Show perp dist” to see the lines representing the perpendicular distances between each line of action of the force and the pivot P.

Taking moments about P,

Clockwise moment due to T = Anti-clockwise moment due to W

$$T \times (5.0\text{ m} – 0.8\text{ m}) \sin 30^{\circ} = W \times (\dfrac{5.0\text{ m}}{2} – 0.8\text{ m}) \cos 30^{\circ}$$

$$T \times 2.10 \text{ m} = 850 \text{ N} \times 1.472 \text{ m}$$

$$T = 596 \approx 600 \text{ N}$$

Approach 2: Resolving the forces to obtain components of forces perpendicular to the beam

In the same applet, check the box that says “Resolve forces”

Taking moments about P,

Clockwise moment due to $T_{\perp}$ = Anti-clockwise moment due to $W_{\perp}$

$$T \sin 30^{\circ} \times (5.0\text{ m} – 0.8\text{ m}) = 850 \text{ N} \cos 30^{\circ} \times (\dfrac{5.0\text{ m}}{2} – 0.8\text{ m})$$

$$T \times 0.500 \times 4.2 \text{ m} = 850 \text{ N} \times 0.866 \times 1.7 \text{ m}$$

$$T = 596 \approx 600 \text{ N}$$

DC Circuits Practice

The simulation below allows students to practise calculating potential differences and currents of a slightly complex circuit, involving three different modes that can be toggled by clicking on the switch.

Link: https://www.geogebra.org/m/jkckp9pr

Mode 1: Two Resistors in Series

When resistors \( R_1 \) and \( R_2 \) are connected in series, the total resistance is simply the sum of the individual resistances:

\[ R_{\text{total}} = R_1 + R_2 \]

The current \( I \) through the circuit is given by Ohm’s Law:

\[ I = \frac{V_{\text{total}}}{R_{\text{total}}} = \frac{V_{\text{total}}}{R_1 + R_2} \]

where \( V_{\text{total}} \) is the total potential difference supplied by the source.

The potential difference across each resistor can be calculated using:

\[ V_1 = I \cdot R_1, \quad V_2 = I \cdot R_2 \]

Mode 2: \( R_1 \) and \( R_3 \) in Parallel, \( R_2 \) in Series

In this mode, resistors \( R_1 \) and \( R_3 \) are in parallel, and \( R_2 \) is in series with the combination. First, calculate the equivalent resistance of the parallel combination:

\[ \frac{1}{R_{\text{parallel}}} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_3} \]

Thus, the total resistance is:

\[ R_{\text{total}} = R_{\text{parallel}} + R_2 \]

The current through the circuit is:

\[ I = \frac{V_{\text{total}}}{R_{\text{total}}} \]

The potential difference across \( R_2 \) is:

\[ V_2 = I \cdot R_2 \]

Since \( R_1 \) and \( R_3 \) are in parallel, they share the same potential difference:

\[ V_1 = V_3 = V_{\text{total}} – V_2 \]

The current through each parallel resistor can be found using Ohm’s Law:

\[ I_1 = \frac{V_1}{R_1}, \quad I_3 = \frac{V_3}{R_3} \]

Mode 3: \( R_1 \) and \( R_2 \) in Series, \( R_3 \) in Parallel

Here, resistors \( R_1 \) and \( R_2 \) are connected in series, and the combination is in parallel with \( R_3 \). First, calculate the resistance of the series combination:

\[ R_{\text{series}} = R_1 + R_2 \]

Then, find the total resistance of the parallel combination:

\[ \frac{1}{R_{\text{total}}} = \frac{1}{R_{\text{series}}} + \frac{1}{R_3} \]

The total current is:

\[ I = \frac{V_{\text{total}}}{R_{\text{total}}} \]

The voltage across the parallel combination is the same for both branches:

\[ V_1 + V_2 = V_3 = V_{\text{total}} \]

The current through \( R_3 \) is:

\[ I_3 = \frac{V_3}{R_3} \]

The current through \( R_1 \) and \( R_2 \), which are in series, is the same:

\[ I_{\text{series}} = \frac{V_{\text{total}}}{R_1 + R_2} \]

The voltage across each series resistor is:

\[ V_1 = I_{\text{series}} \cdot R_1, \quad V_2 = I_{\text{series}} \cdot R_2 \]

Representing a Longitudinal Wave Graphically

I modified an existing simulation to demonstrate how the displacement of particles along a longitudinal wave can be represented in graphical form.

Essentially, one would have to determine for each particle, its displacement from the equilibrium position and its corresponding position along the wave’s direction. On the graph, positive displacement indicates movement in one direction (e.g., to the right), while negative displacement indicates movement in the opposite direction (e.g., to the left).

For the full view, go to https://www.geogebra.org/m/kq3e2qjk

Interactive Heating and Cooling Curves

Heating and cooling curves are graphical representations that show how the temperature of a substance changes as heat is added or removed over time. They illustrate the behavior of substances as they go through different states—solid, liquid, and gas.

Heating Curve: This curve shows how the temperature of a substance increases as it absorbs heat. The curve typically rises as the substance heats up, with plateaus indicating phase changes, where the substance absorbs energy but its temperature remains constant. Check out the heating curves for water and nitrogen using the drop-down menu.

Cooling Curve: This curve is the opposite of the heating curve. It shows how the temperature decreases as the substance loses heat. Like the heating curve, it also has plateaus where phase changes occur, but this time, the substance releases energy. In addition to water, you can also see the cooling curve for ethanol.

With these ChatGPT-generated interactive graphs, users can change the rate of heat input or released from the substance. They can also read the descriptions that explain the changes in the average PE and KE of the molecules during each process.

Geiger–Müller counter simulation

A Geiger-Muller (GM) counter is an instrument for detecting and measuring ionizing radiation. It operates by using a Geiger-Muller tube filled with gas, which becomes ionized when radiation passes through it. This ionization produces an electrical pulse that is counted and displayed, allowing users to determine the presence and intensity of radiation.

Svjo-2, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

This simulation (find it at https://physicstjc.github.io/sls/gm-counter) allows students to explore the random nature of radiation and the significance of accounting for background radiation in experiments. Here’s a guide to help students investigate these concepts using the simulation.

Exploring Background Radiation

Q1: Set the source to “Background” and start the count. Observe the count for a few minutes. What do you notice about the counts recorded?

A1: The counts recorded are relatively low and vary randomly. This reflects the background radiation which is always present.


Q2: Why is it important to measure background radiation before testing other sources?

A2: Measuring background radiation is important to establish a baseline level of radiation. This helps in accurately identifying and quantifying the additional radiation from other sources.


Investigating a Banana as a Radiation Source

Q3: Change the source to “Banana” and reset the data. Start the count and observe the readings. How do the counts from the banana compare to the background radiation?

A3: The counts from the banana are higher than the background radiation. This is because bananas contain a small amount of radioactive potassium-40.


Q4: How do the counts per minute (CPM) for the banana vary over time? Is there a pattern or do the counts appear random?

A4: The counts per minute for the banana vary over time and appear random, reflecting the stochastic nature of radioactive decay.


Exploring a Cesium-137 Source

Q5: Set the source to “Cesium-137” and reset the data. Start the count and observe the readings. How do the counts from Cesium-137 compare to both the background radiation and the banana?

A5: The counts from Cesium-137 are significantly higher than both the background radiation and the banana. This is because Cesium-137 is a much stronger radioactive source.


Q6: What do the counts per minute (CPM) tell you about the intensity of the Cesium-137 source compared to the other sources?

A6: The CPM for Cesium-137 is much higher, indicating a higher intensity of radiation compared to the background and banana sources.


Understanding the Random Nature of Radiation

Q7: By looking at the sample counts, can you predict the next count value? Why or why not?

A7: No, you cannot predict the next count value because radioactive decay is a random process. Each decay event is independent of the previous ones.


Q8: How can you use the background radiation measurement to correct the readings from the banana and Cesium-137 sources?

A8: You can subtract the average background CPM from the CPM of the banana and Cesium-137 sources to get the corrected readings, isolating the radiation from the specific sources.


Graphical Representation of Waves

Use the quiz below to test your ability to interpret graphs of waves. You can click on a point in the map to read the values.

The codes for this quiz are generated by AI. However, the options and correct answers are rule-based and as such, should not have any errors.

It is able to randomly select from 4 different questions for displacement-distance graphs and 4 others for displacement-time graphs, while randomising the values of amplitude, wavelength and period.